wp44329979.png
wpe47324ea.png
wpa070c32e_0f.jpg
wpd1d52e29.png
wp90cfb27f_0f.jpg
wp62d84eab_0f.jpg

I have a longstanding (since 1971) interest in the effects of ionising radiation on health. My primary research interest is in how the cell is regulated. This work is stimulated by the relatively recent uncovering of the property of ionising radiation to induce instability in the genome and the related effect, the so called bystander effect in which a cell experiencing damage inflicted by ionising radiation affects surrounding cells, which then exhibit effects similar to the genomic instability. These are examples of epigenetic effects and I believe helps us to better understand how the mammalian cell works. My latest publication can be found here. In addition I have a number of other interests which can be found below. I  am a Docent  in the Department of Environmental Science at the University of Eastern Finland and   responsible for preparing courses in health and ionising radiation as well as conducting research.

Keith Baverstock's homepage

Chernobyl accident

I have had a longstanding interest in the Chernobyl accident. My current interest is in an EC project, ARCH, to establish a strategic research agenda for the health consequences of the accident.

Depleted uranium

In 2006 I gave evidence to the Belgian Defence Committee on the toxicity of depleted uranium.

Risks of low doses

Whether low doses of ionising radiation delivered at low dose rates, as is typically the case for environmental exposures, lead to health effects is one of the most controversial issues. I have been involved in the topic since 1971. .

 

Lecture

In June 2006 I presented a lecture at the University of Exeter entitled What kind of a thing is the genome?. Although my ideas have been modified somewhat since then this lecture still remains valid in most parts.

 

 

A Biosketch detailing aspects of my career .

My recent publications.

Contact: keith(at)kbaverstock.org

wp5533b116.gif
wp5533b116.gif
wpe1aa957c_0f.jpg
wp5533b116.gif
wp5533b116.gif

Essay

I hold the view that the coding sequence in DNA is not sufficient to define phenotype on its own; there must be another sort of information inherited along with the DNA. This essay says what that is and why it  is needed. The title: "Only DNA? Really?"

wp5533b116.gif